Let's delve into the intriguing world of documentary filmmaking and its unique approach to exploring cinematic flops.
The Art of Documenting Flops: A Unique Perspective
In the realm of documentary filmmaking, there's an intriguing dichotomy. On one hand, we have documentaries that celebrate the triumphs of cinema, shining a spotlight on the masterpieces that have left an indelible mark on our culture. On the other, there are those that dare to delve into the murky waters of cinematic failures, examining the reasons behind the flops that have become infamous in Hollywood lore.
Boorman and the Devil: A Tale of Missteps and Redemption
Enter “Boorman and the Devil”, a captivating documentary that takes us behind the scenes of one of the most notorious flops in cinematic history: “Exorcist II: The Heretic”. Directed by David Kittredge, this documentary offers a unique perspective on the making (and unmaking) of a film that has become synonymous with disaster.
What makes this documentary particularly fascinating is its access to the key players involved. Director John Boorman, a veteran of the industry with a long and celebrated career, opens up about his one massive flop. Boorman's willingness to participate in the documentary is a rare treat, as many filmmakers are often reluctant to revisit their failures. Accompanying him are the surviving cast members, including the iconic Linda Blair and the late Louise Fletcher, who recorded extensive interviews before her passing in 2022.
The Making of a Flop: A Director's Perspective
Boorman is quick to point out that the usual excuses for flops, such as studio interference or an indifferent market, do not apply to “Exorcist II”. He had the luxury of a substantial budget, final cut privileges, and a supportive studio. So, what went wrong?
In his own words, Boorman admits that he was the wrong person to helm a sequel to “The Exorcist”. He didn't resonate with the original film and set out to create a riposte, focusing on the power of good rather than the power of evil. Unfortunately, this creative choice didn't align with the expectations of the audience in 1977.
A Director's Reflection: Humility and Self-Criticism
Boorman's engagement with the documentary is a testament to his humility and self-awareness. As a gifted storyteller, he brings a charismatic and humble presence to the screen. Having established his place in the cinematic pantheon with celebrated films like “Point Blank”, “Deliverance”, “Excalibur”, and “Hope and Glory”, Boorman can afford to be candid about his failures.
He openly discusses the impact of “Exorcist II’s” failure, revealing how it sent him into a tailspin. In a panic, he made the decision to butcher the film, creating a new version for international audiences and begging Warner Bros. to release it domestically – a move he later admitted was a mistake.
Analyzing the Flaws: A Director's Self-Reflection
Boorman takes full responsibility for the film's shortcomings. He acknowledges that he didn't understand or care about what the audience wanted from a sequel to “The Exorcist”. He praises the performances of Linda Blair and Louise Fletcher, who both endured criticism for their roles, and even defends Richard Burton, placing the blame for his lackluster performance on his own shoulders.
One of the most intriguing aspects of the documentary is Boorman's collaboration with Rospo Pallenberg. Together, they aimed to create a dreamlike film, but their creative choices proved disastrous. From the tap-dancing scenes featuring Blair to the sleep-inducing sequences involving the “synchronizer,” it's clear that their vision didn't translate well on screen.
A Fresh Perspective: Appreciating the Merits of a Flop
Director Mike Flanagan, who is currently working on his own “Exorcist” movie, offers a unique take on “Exorcist II”. While he doesn't call it a “good” film, Flanagan appreciates the dynamic cinematography by William A. Fraker and the score by Ennio Morricone. This perspective challenges the notion that a film must be a critical success to be worthy of appreciation.
The Value of Cinematic Failure
As a personal reflection, I'd argue that “Exorcist II”, despite its flaws, holds more value than the recent “The Exorcist: Believer”. It was a film made with passion and good intentions, even if it didn't resonate with audiences. In a world of assembly-line cinema, where sequels and remakes often feel formulaic, “Exorcist II” stands as a reminder of the risks and rewards of artistic expression.
“Boorman and the Devil” opens a window into the complex world of cinematic failure, offering a thought-provoking exploration of a film's legacy and the impact it had on its creators. It's a must-watch for anyone interested in the behind-the-scenes drama of Hollywood.
